Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 16;467(1):84–93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0541-8

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Digital radiographs taken at the 25% mark demonstrate higher cement penetration for the BHR as compared with the Conserve Plus® implant for both the low-viscosity cementation technique (left panel) and the high-viscosity cementation technique (right panel). With the high-viscosity technique, four of six BHR implants could not be seated properly (in the current figure, Conserve is not seated also).