Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 30;467(1):206–212. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0573-0

Table 1.

Treatment algorithm for femoral defects

Gross’ classification Type of defect Treatment alternatives
Type 1 No significant bone loss Conventional cemented or uncemented femoral component
Type 2 Contained (cavitary) bone loss Proximally porous-coated implantExtensively porous-coated implants for ingrowthExtensively grit-blasted titanium implants for ongrowthImpaction grafting with a cemented componentModular implants for proximal or extensive ingrowth or ongrowthLong-stemmed cemented implants
Type 3 Segmental (full circumferential) bone loss from the proximal femur that is less than 5 cm in length and involves the calcar and the lesser trochanter but does not extend into the diaphysis As in Type 2 with a calcar replacement option
Type 4 Segmental (full circumferential) bone loss of greater than 5 cm in length extending into the diaphysis Allograft-prosthesis composite or tumor prosthesis
Type 5 As in Type 4 with the addition of a periprosthetic fracture Allograft-prosthesis composite or tumor prosthesis