Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 8;337:a2396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a2396

Table 1.

 Characteristics of participating units by cluster*

Unit No Total annual births Birth unit Unit type* Labour suite midwives Midwives’ consent (%)
Experimental (n=19 410)
2 3166 No 11c 30 102† (100)
4 1305 No 11c 48 31 (65)
7 3324 Yes 11c 27 Missing data
9 1888 No 11c 33 31 (94)
10 950 No 11b 39 25 (64)
12 5242 Yes 111 61 35 (57)
14 3535 No 111 26 24 (92)
Control (n=20 682)
1 1042 No 11b NA NA
3 2988 No 11c NA NA
5 4183 Yes 111 NA NA
6 3426 No 111 NA NA
8 3590 No 11c NA NA
11 2710 Yes 11c NA NA
13 2743 No 11c NA NA

NA=not applicable.

*11b=consultant led maternity unit with on-site special care baby unit and annual births <1000; 11c=consultant led maternity unit with easy access to neonatal intensive care, adult high dependency, and adult intensive care and annual births 1000-3000; 111=consultant led specialist maternity unit with on-site neonatal intensive care, access to adult intensive care, and annual births >3000.

†Recruitment seems to exceed total number of midwives in one cluster because team model of midwifery care was operating in that unit; this meant that most hospital and community based midwives had labour suite commitment during study period.