Fig. 5.

Correlation of the experimental remapping deficit with severity of clinical neglect. Remapping cost was computed as the difference in accuracy for gaze-left minus gaze-right conditions (x axis) and then related to several clinical measures (y axis). There were positive correlations with: (A) the total number of items missed in Mesulam cancellation; (B) the magnitude of ipsilesional deviation on line bisection; and (C) a composite score of neglect severity, summing deficits across several different clinical tests (see main text). (D) There was no reliable correlation with other clinical variables, such as the time since stroke onset or lesion volume.