Table 2.
Binding Affinity | [35S]GTP-γ-S binding | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peptidea | hDORb, [3H]DPDPEc | rMORb, [3H]DAMGOd | hDORb | rMORb | ||||||
Log IC50e | Ki/nMf | Log IC50e | Ki/nMf | Log EC50g | EC50/nM | ECmaxh | Log EC50g | EC50/nM | Emaxh | |
1 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 780 | 190 | 42 | 69 | ||||
2 | 3.8 | 9.2 | 200 | 110 | 25 | 110 | ||||
3 | 0.3 | 1300 | 14 | 150 | 110 | 42 | ||||
4 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 44 | 1.7 | 45 | ||||
5 | 57 | 43. | n/d | n/d | 42 | 69 | ||||
6 | 510 | 1500 | 2000 | 43 | 5400 | 58 | ||||
RSA504 | 23. | 27 | 5.5 | 81 | 0.47 | 110 | ||||
DPDPE | n.d. | - | n.d. | - | −8.8±0.25 | 1.6 | 69±4.2 | - | - | |
DAMGO CCK-8 | n.d. | - | n.d. | - | n.d. | - | - | −7.44±0.19 | 37 | 150±9.4 |
Refer to Table 1 for the structure of the peptides.
Carried out using membrane preparations from transfected HN9.10 cells that constitutively expressed the respective opioid receptor type.
Kd = 0.50 ± 0.1 nM.
Kd = 0.85 ± 0.2 nM.
Logarithmic values determined from the non-linear regression analysis of data collected from at least 2 independent experiments.
Caculated using the Cheng and Prusoff equation to correct for the concentration of the radioligand used in the assay.
Logarithmic values determined from the non-linear regression analysis of data collected from at least 2 independent experiments. The EC50 value is converted from the respective log EC50.
[35S]GTP-γ-S bound / basal [35S]GTP-γ-S bound] X 100 ± standard error. n.c. incomplete competition of the radioligand at the highest test concentration of the peptide. An IC50 value cannot be determined. n.s. non-saturable dose-response curve. In these cases,stimulation of [35S]GTP-γ-S binding was observed only at the highest test dose(s) of the peptide (1 ×10−5 and 1 × 10−4 M). An EC50 or Emax value cannot be determined. n.d. not determined.