Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Transplant Proc. 2008 Jun;40(5):1285–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.131

Table 1.

The details on donors, recipients and kidneys grouped by CIT categories.

Transplant periods 1990–1995 1996–2000
CIT groups <10 hr 10–20 hr 20–30 hr >30 hr combined <10 hr 10–20 hr 20–30 hr >30 hr combined
Recipients numbers 3638 15,288 14,797 9433 43,156 3286 13,896 11,146 3547 31,875
Recipient age (yr) 42 ± 14 42 ± 14 43 ± 14 43 ± 14 43 ± 14 45 ± 15 46 ± 14 45 ± 14 47 ± 13 46 ± 14**
Wait for transplant (yr) 1.1 ±1.0 1.2 ± 1.1 1.3 ± 1.2 1.2 ± 1.1 1.2 ±1.2 1.7 ± 1.5 1.7 ± 1.5 1.8 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 1.6 1.7 ± 1.6**
Retransplant (%) 13 15 16 17 16 10 13 14 13 13**
Peak PRA >30% (%) 15 16 19 19 18 15 16 18 17 17
HLA mismatch 3.5 ± 1.4 3.4 ±1.5 3.2 ± 1.6* 3.4 ± 1.6 3.3 ± 1.6 3.8 ± 1.5 3.3 ± 1.7 2.9 ± 1.9* 3.3 ± 1.7 3.2 ± 1.8
Donor age (yr) 31 ± 16 32 ± 16 33 ± 17 33 ± 18 33 ± 17 35 ± 17 34 ± 17 36 ± 18 37 ± 18 36 ± 17**
ECD 12 13 12 12 12 17 18 18 19 18**
DCD 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.8* 0.6 1 1.2 1.9 2.6* 1.6**
DGF (%) 18 21 26 35* 24 18 22 26 36* 25
*

P <0.05 compared to all other CIT groups within the specific transplant period.

**

P <0.05 compared to the “combined” value in 1990–1995, i.e., comparison between the combined value of 1990–1995 and of 1996–2000; mean ± SD.