Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1906–1912. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.013

Table 1.

Findings of studies comparing ultrasound pachymetry with Orbscan II in determinations of central corneal thickness.

Investigator Study Population N Eyes US±SD µm Orbscan±SD µm US-Orbscan µm
Doughty9 Normals 50 523±37 544±40 −21
Fernandez10 Normals 92 551.2±43.8 559.9±35.8 −9
Gherghel11 Normals 137 550.5±37.2 546.4±48.1 4
Gonzalez-Meijome12 Normals 24 545±40 515±45 30
Iskander13 Normals* 906 532.6±30.0 514.2±33.0 18
Kawana14 Normals 203 478.8±41.9 445.6±60.0 33
Lackner15 Normals 30 552.0±31.7 530.0±33.9 22
McLaren16 Normal 24 554±28 540±35 14
Rainer4 Normal 40 543.4±34.8 523.6±36.2 20
Suzuki30 Normal 216 548.1±33.0 546.9±35.4 1
Radford17 Glaucoma 66 558.4±34.6 564.9±36.5 7
Iskander13 Post-LASIK 183 482.8±40.0 432.7±44.0 50
Kawana14 Post-LASIK 203 478.8±41.9 445.6±60.0 33
Ho18 Post-LASIK 103 438.2±41.2 435.2±49.6** 3**
Gherghel11 Keratoconus 64 502.8±52.5 458.8±62.5 44
Kawana19 Keratoconus 22 485.0±29.3 449.5±43.2 35
*

Pre-LASIK

**

Acoustic correction factor = 0.89