Table 1.
Ten highest ranking bacterial strains based on Mahalanobis distance and δ-distance for plasmid pXO1 from B. anthracis str. Ames Ancestor
Bacterial strain | Phylum | D2 | P(D2) | δ | P(δ) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sorted by Mahalanobis distance | |||||
Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 | Firmicutes | 2.17 | 0.994 | 47.5 | 0.517 |
Bacillus thuringiensisstr. Al Hakam | Firmicutes | 2.83 | 0.987 | 50.6 | 0.415 |
Bacillus cereus E33L | Firmicutes | 2.86 | 0.986 | 50.0 | 0.415 |
Bacillus thuringiensis serovar konkukian str. 97-27 | Firmicutes | 2.91 | 0.989 | 51.0 | 0.423 |
Bacillus anthracis str. Ames Ancestora | Firmicutes | 3.26 | 0.988 | 52.2 | 0.379 |
Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 | Firmicutes | 3.42 | 0.977 | 50.9 | 0.406 |
Bacillus cereus subsp. cytotoxis NVH 391-98 | Firmicutes | 4.44 | 0.960 | 59.2 | 0.226 |
Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 | Firmicutes | 5.43 | 0.926 | 50.8 | 0.378 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A | Firmicutes | 5.72 | 0.887 | 55.5 | 0.306 |
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 | Firmicutes | 7.03 | 0.858 | 57.3 | 0.216 |
Sorted by δ-distance | |||||
Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 | Cyanobacteria | 53.01 | 0.018 | 41.7 | 0.440 |
Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 | Cyanobacteria | 62.56 | 0.012 | 42.7 | 0.429 |
Buchnera aphidicola str. APS (Acyrthosiphon pisum) | Proteobacteria | 19.64 | 0.211 | 43.1 | 0.523 |
Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 | Firmicutes | 2.17 | 0.994 | 47.5 | 0.517 |
Bacillus cereus E33L | Firmicutes | 2.86 | 0.986 | 50.0 | 0.415 |
Bacillus thuringiensis str. Al Hakam | Firmicutes | 2.83 | 0.987 | 50.6 | 0.415 |
Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118 | Firmicutes | 5.43 | 0.926 | 50.8 | 0.378 |
Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 | Firmicutes | 3.42 | 0.977 | 50.9 | 0.406 |
Bacillus thuringiensis serovar konkukian str. 97-27 | Firmicutes | 2.91 | 0.989 | 51.0 | 0.423 |
Bacteroides fragilis NCTC 9343 | Bacteroidetes | 9.91 | 0.711 | 51.2 | 0.297 |
D2, Mahalanobis distance; P(D2), P-value based on Mahalanobis distance; δ, δ-distance; P(δ), P-value based on δ-distance.
aKnown host.
The P-values are not completely negatively correlated with the distances because they are based on empirical distributions that differ between bacterial chromosomes.