Table 3.
I | II | |||||
feature set | reduction method | #features | ACC | ACC | ||
- | 73 | 0.777 | 0.799 | 0.790 | 0.828 | |
ℬ | - | 73 | 0.818 | 0.833 | 0.806 | 0.835 |
SDA | 17 | 0.860 | 0.873 | 0.873 | 0.887 | |
ℬ | SDA | 15 | 0.878 | 0.891 | 0.883 | 0.892 |
Although the SFAMs were trained using both manually and automatically obtained protein distribution patterns, the evaluation is performed separately. Here, I denotes the accuracies regarding the manually acquired patterns and II the results with respect to the automatically generated samples. The results indicate an advantage of feature set ℬ in comparison to feature set . Moreover, the feature reduction leads to a significant improvement of the protein localisation, independent from the feature set applied.