Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2009 Jan;74(1):61–71. doi: 10.1002/prot.22124

Table II.

Loss of function mutations in A. thaliana ILL2 homologs.

Mutation Corresponding residue in ILL2 Is highly conserved residue? Distance between Cα and metal 1 [Å] Structural hypothesis about of origins of the defect
E69Ka E68 yes 15.0 Conformation of the loop harboring general base Glu172 and metal ligand Glu173 will be altered due to loss of stabilizing hydrogen-bond. Possible salt bridge to Asp114 could further disturb local geometry next to the active site.
G139Da G138 yes 8.0 Steric clash resulting from the mutation will directly compromise positioning of metal coordinating residues Cys137 and His139.
G415Ea G411 no 18.2 Mutation places bulky, charged residue into a hydrophobic core of the protein formed by Met145, Ile196, Leu198, Leu384, Val407, and Ile414. Protein likely misfolds.
S206Lb S209 no 18.5 Mutation results in a loss of hydrogen bonds to His380 and fully conserved Asn337. Bulkier, hydrophobic residue at this position may disturbs Phe381 which is involved in formation of, the indole-binding hydrophobic pocket.
G224Eb G227 yes 41.6 Not clear. Residue is located at the tip of the satellite domain.
G226Eb G229 no Not clear, residue not resolved in the structure of ILL2. Residue is likely located at the tip of the satellite domain.
A230Tb A233 no Not clear, residue not resolved in the structure of ILL2. Residue is likely located at the tip of the satellite domain.
a

Mutation identified in A.thaliana ILR1.8

b

Mutation identified in A.thaliana IAR3.9