Skip to main content
. 2000 Feb 15;20(4):1538–1549. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-04-01538.2000

Table 3.

Primary afferent evoked EPSPs in laminae II–III neurons

Type of EPSPs n = Latency (msec) Peak amplitude (mV) EPSP slope (dV/dT) Number of peaks
Lamina II
 Control Low-threshold mono 1 2.1 14.5 8.5 1.0
Low-threshold poly 6 13.7 ± 2.8 2.8 ± 1.2
High-threshold mono 27 2.4 ± 1.2 11.8 ± 3.7 6.3 ± 2.7 1.2 ± 0.4
High-threshold poly 2 16.1 ± 2.9 2.5 ± 0.7
 Axotomy Low-threshold mono 13 1.9 ± 0.5 15.5 ± 4.0** 11.7 ± 3.6*** 2.3 ± 1.4*
Low-threshold poly 18 20.3 ± 6.6 2.9 ± 1.0
High-threshold mono 19 2.5 ± 1.1 11.9 ± 4.3 7.1 ± 2.8 1.4 ± 0.5
High-threshold poly 2 17.6 ± 3.9 2.5 ± 0.7
Lamina III
 Control Low-threshold mono 16 1.8 ± 0.3 17.5 ± 2.6 14.0 ± 2.2 2.9 ± 1.5
Low-threshold poly 7 17.3 ± 2.6 2.4 ± 0.5
High-threshold poly 3 18.7 ± 2.2 2.3 ± 0.6
 Axotomy Low-threshold mono 15 1.7 ± 0.3 17.1 ± 1.7 12.5 ± 2.6 2.6 ± 1.6
Low-threshold poly 6 16.4 ± 2.6 2.8 ± 0.8
High-threshold poly 1 16.2 2.0

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Low-threshold EPSPs were evoked at relatively low-intensity stimulation (<20 V, 100 msec). High-threshold EPSPs were evoked at relatively high-intensity stimulation (40–80 V, 100 msec). p values were calculated using the Student's t test; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; in comparison of monosynaptic EPSPs in axotomy versus high-threshold monosynaptic EPSPs in control.