Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009 Jan;28(1):63–75. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e31817d9c61

Table 1.

Patient Clinical and Histopathological Data

Cell line Age TNM classification Grade of the SCC Prior therapy Site of the specimen Survival after initial diagnosis
UM-SCV-1A* 62 T3N2M1 well –poor none primary 2 months
UM-SCV-1B* 62 T3N2M1 poor none Metastasis 2 months
UM-SCV-2* 86 T3N1M0 poor surgery local recurrence 10 months
UM-SCV-3* 66 T2N0M0 mod–well none primary >4, 5 years
UM-SCV-4* 41 T2N2M0 well none primary >4 years
UM-SCV-6* 43 T1N1M0 mod surgery primary 15 months
UM-SCV-7* 77 T2N2M0 well –poor none primary 1 month
UT-SCV-1* 71 T2N1M0 well surgery + RTa Metastasis 1 year
UT-SCV-2* 63 T1N0M0 mod surgery + RTa + CTb local recurrence >13 years
UT-SCV-3* 73 T3N2M0 mod none primary 3 months
UT-SCV-4 31 T2N0M0 mod none primary 10 years
UT-SCV-5 46 T3N2M1 well none pleural effusion 5 weeks
UT-SCV-6 72 T3N2N0 well none primary 8 weeks
a

RT indicates radiotherapy.

b

CT indicates chemotherapy.

*

Raitanen M, et. al. Characterization of 10 vulvar carcinoma cell lines by karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93(1):155–63.

personal communication Dr. Seija Grenman, Turku Central University, Turku, Finland