Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;32(1):75–80. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1099

Table 2.

Alternative risk adjustment measures in prospective expenditure models

Risk adjustment model Total expenditures
Inpatient expenditures
Outpatient expenditures
Adjusted R2 Rank Adjusted R2 Rank Adjusted R2 Rank
Age and sex alone (%) 0.14 10 0.18 10 0.22 10
Prior-year expenditure 2.80 7 0.58 7 35.10 1
Functional status measure
    PCS + MCS (from SF-36) 0.64 9 0.23 9 2.59 8
Comorbidity measures
    CCI (%) 3.26 4 1.71 3 7.75 7
    SIC 0.65 8 0.49 8 0.79 9
Risk adjustment measures
    ACG 3.56 3 1.33 4 14.80 5
    DCG-HCC 5.58 2 2.36 2 19.63 3
    CDPS 3.02 6 0.90 6 16.25 4
    RxRisk-V 3.23 5 1.33 4 11.79 6
Diabetes-specific measure
    Diabetes complications count 0.10 11 0.10 11 0.22 10
    DCG-HCC + diabetes complications count 5.80 1 2.55 1 20.04 2

N = 3,092. All self-report and diagnosis-based measures include age and sex. The PCS and MCS were included as distinct explanatory variables in the PCS + MCS model above. Highest R2 values are shown in bold face.