Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;32(1):106–110. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1233

Table 2.

Relationship between retinal vascular fractal dimension and diabetic retinopathy

Retinal fractal dimension N total Prevalence* Age and sex adjusted P value Multivariable adjusted P value
Per 0.01 increase 729 1.33 (1.19–1.49) <0.001 1.37 (1.21–1.56) <0.001
Quartile 1: <1.45023 182 16 (8.8) 1.0 1.0
Quartile 2: 1.45023–1.46207 182 31 (17.0) 2.16 (1.13–4.12) 0.020 2.07 (1.03–4.18) 0.041
Quartile 3: 1.46214–1.47215 182 39 (21.4) 2.94 (1.57–5.52) 0.001 3.01 (1.53–5.94) 0.001
Quartile 4: ≥1.47217 183 51 (27.9) 4.07 (2.21–7.49) <0.001 3.92 (2.02–7.61) <0.001
Ptrend <0.001 <0.001

Data are n (%) or OR (95% CI).

*

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in either eye.

OR (95% CI) of prevalent diabetic retinopathy (any grade compared with none in either eye) adjusted for age (continuous per 1 year increase) and sex.

OR (95% CI) adjusted for age (continuous per 1 year increase), sex, diabetes duration (continuous-per 1 year increase), A1C (continuous per 1 mmol/l increase), MABP (continuous per 1 mmHg), BMI (continuous per 1 kg/m2 increase), and total cholesterol (continuous per 1 mmol/l increase).