Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;112(1):95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.005

Table 2.

Odds ratios from univariate logistic regression models for average tumor size, using a threshold of >3 cm versus <=3 cm, by modality based on the prospective reads, along with the estimated diagnostic probabilities and ROC AUC for detection of histologic lymph node involvement

Response Modality Odds ratio (95% CI) NPV PPV Sensitivity Specificity AUC (SE)
Histologic lymph node involvement specific to common iliac (with or without paraaortic nodes MRI 4.1 (1.5, 11.5) 0.93 0.22 0.61 0.72 0.70 (0.06)
CT 2.7 (1.1, 7.0) 0.91 0.22 0.57 0.67 0.63 (0.07)
Clinical 7.4 (2.5, 21.6) 0.95 0.27 0.75 0.71 0.73 (0.06)
Pathologic 1.4 (0.3, 7.4) 0.93 0.09 0.22 0.83 0.64 (0.08)
General histologic lymph node involvement (Any positive node) MRI 4.6 (2.2, 9.5) 0.78 0.57 0.54 0.80 0.68 (0.04)
CT 2.3 (1.2, 4.7) 0.72 0.48 0.49 0.71 0.63 (0.05)
Clinical 4.0 (2.0, 8.0) 0.77 0.55 0.56 0.76 0.64 (0.05)
Pathologic 3.0 (1.2, 7.6) 0.75 0.50 0.29 0.88 0.62 (0.05)