1. one group, presented with novel learning opportunities |
Cambefort (1981), Paquette (1992), Tonooka et al. (1997), Biro et al. (2003) and Huffman & Hirata (2004)
|
|
|
2. action explicitly seeded in one group but no baseline |
Sumita et al. (1985), Hannah & McGrew (1987), Reader & Laland (2000) and Swaney et al. (2001)
|
|
|
3. one experimental group with one trained, seeded action, following no-model baseline |
Gajdon et al. (2004) |
Menzel et al. (1972) |
Curio et al. (1978a) |
4. one experimental condition with one trained, seeded action, versus no-model control condition |
Lefebvre (1986) and Cloutier et al. (2002)
|
Stanley et al. (2008) |
Laland & Plotkin (1990, 1992) |
5. two experimental conditions, with alternative actions seeded in each |
de Waal & Johanowicz (1993), Freeberg (1998) and Freeberg et al. (2001)
|
Galef & Allen (1995) and Laland & Williams (1997, 1998) |
(Freeberg (1998), Freeberg et al. 2001 *see also Col. A) |
6. two experimental conditions, with alternative actions seeded in each, after baseline, no-model control period |
Fragaszy et al. (2004), Price & Caldwell (2007) and Whiten et al. (2007)
|
|
(Whiten et al. (2007), *see also Col. A) |
7. two experimental conditions, with alternative actions seeded in each, plus third, no-model control condition |
Langan (1996), Brown & Laland (2002), Whiten et al. (2005), Bonnie et al. (2006) and Hopper et al. (2007)
|
|
Laland & Plotkin (1993), Horner et al. (2006) and Dindo et al. (2008)
|