Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 25;5(21):449–455. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1161

Table 2.

Model predictions of fat mass and birth weight compared with empirical data.

source and parameters model predictions empirical data


birth weight (kg) fat mass (kg) birth weight (kg) fat mass (kg)
low glycaemic diet, Clapp (1998) 3.45 0.231 3.33 0.266
g=0.55, m=2200
P(140)=181, μ=32
γ=0.0004, K=424
runner group, Bergmann et al. (2004) 3.49 0.37 3.44 0.38
g=0.65, m=2200
P(140)=255, μ=32
γ=0.00023, K=522
non-exercising group, Bergmann et al. (2004) 3.53 0.31 3.53 0.42
g=0.65, c=0.011, m=2200
P(140)=181, μ=32
γ=0.00027, K=424