Table 2.

Log-likelihood values and RELL BPs (%) for 15 trees for the large dataset. The data of 14 species are analysed to calculate the log-likelihood values for 15 unrooted trees. The trees differ in the relationships among A, B, F and G, but are otherwise identical, as shown in figure 1. See also legend to table 1.

	tree	JC		HKY+Γ5		HKY+C+Γ5		M0		mtmam		mtmam+Γ5
1	(A((FB)G))	−56 845.1	52	−6.0	12	−6.0	3	−3.1	13	−14.8		−8.0
2	(G((FB)A))	−42.0	6	−20.2		−5.8	3	−4.6	14	−18 022.4	28	−0.3	19
3	((AG)(FB))	−73.3		−19.8		−10.6	1	−13.5	1	−9.3	7	−3.5	11
4	(A(F(BG)))	−21.3	6	−7.5	1	−4.2	12	−44 517.0	32	−14.5	2	−6.0	3
5	(A((FG)B))	−6.1	34	−48 504.6	84	−2.0	23	−4.2	12	−27.5		−14.5
6	((BG)(FA))	−103.1		−23.7		−9.7	1	−17.0		−12.5	5	−3.6	11
7	((FG)(BA))	−93.1		−14.7	1	−10.0	1	−24.0		−23.4		−12.1
8	(F((BA)G))	−112.6		−20.9		−13.0		−19.1		−16.5	1	−8.8	1
9	(G((BA)F))	−58.2	2	−20.6		−3.0	15	−6.2	13	−1.4	21	−1.6	13
10	(F((BG)A))	−91.2		−23.7		−14.3		−13.0	2	−10.9	11	−4.2	10
11	(B((FA)G))	−118.8		−20.5		−8.6	2	−23.1		−21.6		−8.9	1
12	(B(F(AG)))	−94.8		−19.4	1	−9.9	3	−17.0	2	−17.7	1	−7.5	3
13	(G((FA)B))	−66.3		−23.2		−45 410.5	33	−7.9	7	−1.6	18	−17 564.7	20
14	(F(B(AG)))	−95.8		−22.4		−11.3	2	−12.8	5	−12.9	6	−5.3	8
15	(B((FG)A))	−93.0		−13.8	2	−10.4	1	−21.7		−28.7		−13.7