Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;11(1):25–34. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080037

Table 2.

Comparison of Aberrations Detected by CGH and Multi-Probe FISH in Pilot Study

Aberrations* Aberration frequency % Aberration containing cells (FISH)
ATM/del11q22.3
FISH+/aCGH+ 14 9–98
FISH+/aCGH− 1 14
Trisomy 12
FISH+/aCGH+ 11 43–78
FISH+/aCGH− 1 57
D13S319/del13q14.3
FISH+/aCGH+ 21 17–94
FISH+/aCGH− 6 11, 11, 13, 19, 22, 25
LAMP1/del13q34
FISH+/aCGH+ 5 35–82
FISH+/aCGH− 5 8, 9, 11, 24, 49
TP53/del17p13.1
FISH+/aCGH+ 13 27–96
FISH+/aCGH− 5 8, 9, 18, 27, 51
*

Analysis done only using CGH Analytics, with calls based on stringent settings.