Skip to main content
. 2008 May 27;4(4):334–337. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0200

Table 1.

Effect of low and high call rates on (a) feeding rate and (b) generosity. (Shown are the results of GLMMs including group and individual identities as random terms. Non-significant terms were deleted from the final models.)

response term explanatory terms F p value effect (s.e.)
(a) feeding rate (g fed per hour) treatment 7.82 0.008 high: 0.0 (0.0), low: −0.48 (0.17)
sex 4.44 0.043 female: 0.0 (0.0), male: −0.39 (0.18)
status 0.36 0.551
treatment×sex 0.95 0.334
treatment×status 1.14 0.291
status×sex 2.08 0.160
(b) generosity (g fed/g found) treatment 14.1 <0.001 high: 0.0 (0.0), low: −0.41 (0.11)
sex 8.06 0.008 female: 0.0 (0.0), male: −0.31 (0.11)
status 0.81 0.375
treatment×sex 4.80 0.034
treatment×status 0.23 0.631
status×sex 2.39 0.133