Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 27;53(1):95–103. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00752-08

TABLE 4.

Predictive performance of the PK modeld

Dose regimena Trial data
Simulated data
% differencec
AUC0-τ,ss (ng·h/ml) Cmax,ss (ng/ml) Cmin,ss (ng/ml) AUC0-τ,ss (ng·h/ml) Cmax,ss (ng/ml) Cmin,ss (ng/ml) AUC0-τ,ss Cmax,ss Cmin,ss
50 mg QD 5,215.08 (1,068.2) 423.6 (85.62) 112.36 (24.95) 5,347.26 (1,405.9) 460.94 (115.87) 114.64 (62.19) 2.53 8.81 2.03
75 mg QD 7,580.19 (2,188.45) 642.83 (205.19) 156.67 (33.96) 8,020.89 (2,108.85) 691.41 (173.8) 171.97 (93.29) 5.81 7.56 9.77
100 mg QD 9,919.53 (2,628.9) 780.5 (130.75) 234.33 (102.32) 10,694.52 (2,811.8) 921.88 (231.73) 229.29 (124.38) 7.81 18.11 −2.15
150 mg QD* 11,785.26 (1,971.95) 870.4 (129.62) 278.8 (53.97) 12,178.91 (3,202.07) 1,049.84 (263.89) 261.11 (141.64) 3.34 20.62 −6.35
150 mg BID* 12,260.34 (2,924.38) 1,488.3 (336.89) 593.67 (131.31) 12,041.42 (3,160.33) 1,716.71 (442.92) 810.51 (392.65) −1.79 15.35 36.53b
a

*, relative bioavailability was adjusted to 41% in simulation.

b

Evening troughs were used for comparison; if morning troughs were used, the value would be −12.52%.

c

Percent difference was calculated as 100·(simulated data − trial data)/trial data.

d

Values in parentheses indicate the standard deviations. Trial and simulated data are given to two decimal places, different from those in Table 1, which are presented as three significant digits.