Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 24;191(1):375–387. doi: 10.1128/JB.00578-08

TABLE 2.

Members of the bipartite family of energy taxis transducers identified by similarity to the CetA HAMP and proximal signaling domains

Species and strain Bacterial phylum or class Accession no. of gene encoding the HAMP domain E valuea Class of HAMP-containing bipartite energy taxis receptorb Accession no. of neighboring ORFc
Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 Betaproteobacteria YP_934977 9.00E-04 I YP_934978
Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 110 Alphaproteobacteria NP_769616 2.00E-06 Id NP_769615
Caminibacter mediatlanticus TB-2 Epsilonproteobacteria ZP_01871323 0.001 I ZP_01871324
ZP_01870851 0.002 I ZP_01870852
Campylobacter coli RM2228 Epsilonproteobacteria ZP_00367208 8.00E-51 Id ZP_00367209, ZP_00367207
Campylobacter concisus 13826 Epsilonproteobacteria YP_001466825 2.00E-06 III YP_001466824
Campylobacter curvus 525.92 Epsilonproteobacteria YP_001408340e 0.001 III YP_001408339
Campylobacter jejuni Epsilonproteobacteria
    11168 NP_282337 (cetA) 7.00E-51 Id NP_282336 (cetB), NP_282338
    81-176 YP_001000865 7.00E-51 Id YP_001000864, YP_001000866
    HB93-13 ZP_01070888 7.00E-51 I ZP_01070815, ZP_01071201
    CG8486 ZP_01809879 7.00E-51 Id ZP_01809880, ZP_01809878
    260.94 ZP_01069112 7.00E-51 Id ZP_01069301, ZP_01069270
    CF93-6 ZP_01068608 7.00E-51 Id ZP_01068595, ZP_01068567
    81116 YP_001482710 7.00E-51 Id YP_001482711, YP_001482709
    RM1221 YP_179311 7.00E-51 Id YP_179312, YP_179310
    84-25 ZP_01099629 8.00E-51 Id ZP_01099329, ZP_01099967
Campylobacter jejuni subsp. doylei 269.97 Epsilonproteobacteria YP_001397715 2.00E-49 Id YP_001397716
Campylobacter lari RM2100 Epsilonproteobacteria ZP_00368322 7.00E-34 I ZP_00368323, ZP_00368324
Campylobacter upsaliensis RM3195 Epsilonproteobacteria ZP_00371342 1.00E-38 I ZP_00371343, ZP_00371341
Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 Betaproteobacteria NP_900065 3.00E-04 I NP_900066
Dechloromonas aromatica RCB Betaproteobacteria YP_287205 7 I YP_287206
Kineococcus radiotolerans SRS30216 Actinobacteria YP_001363132 0.009 III YP_001363131
Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense MSR-1 Alphaproteobacteria CAM75236 0.003 Id CAM75237
CAM75032 0.005 V CAM75033
CAM78133 0.065 VI CAM78134, CAM78135f
Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1 Alphaproteobacteria YP_419949g 3.00E-04 I YP_419948
YP_423371 0.002 I YP_423372
YP_423064 0.06 I YP_423063
YP_420357 0.07 I YP_420358
YP_421559 0.13 I YP_421560
YP_419547 1.9 I YP_419548
Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum MS-1 Alphaproteobacteria ZP_00055894 4.00E-04 IV ZP_00055893
ZP_00207863 9.00E-04 I ZP_00207862
ZP_00208993 0.003 VIII ZP_00208994, ZP_00051415f
ZP_00054945h 0.43 VII ZP_00054944
Oceanobacter sp. strain RED65 Gammaproteobacteria ZP_01306652 0.32 I ZP_01306653
Oceanospirillum sp. strain MED92 Gammaproteobacteria ZP_01166142 0.051 I ZP_01166143
Reinekea sp. strain MED297 Gammaproteobacteria ZP_01113626 0.88 I ZP_01113627
Rhodopseudomonas palustris Alphaproteobacteria
    BisA53 YP_783562 1.00E-04 I YP_783563
    BisB5 YP_568532 4.00E-04 I YP_568531
YP_571029 0.26 I YP_571030
    BisB18 YP_534502 2.00E-06 I YP_534503
    CGA009 NP_949817i 8.00E-05 I NP_949818i
NP_949819i 1.00E-04 II NP_949820i
NP_949538 1.00E-04 Id NP_949539
NP_949647 0.45 I NP_949648
    HaA2 YP_484693 3.00E-07 II YP_484692
YP_485035 8.00E-04 I YP_485034
YP_484934 0.16 I YP_484933
Rhodospirillum rubrum ATCC 11170 Alphaproteobacteria YP_428546j 0.011 I YP_428545
Stappia aggregata IAM 12614 Alphaproteobacteria ZP_01546232 2.00E-04 Id ZP_01546231
Sulfurimonas denitrificans DSM 1251 Epsilonproteobacteria YP_392559 1.00E-05 III YP_392560
Wolinella succinogenes DSM 1740 Epsilonproteobacteria NP_907800 1.00E-11 I NP_907801
NP_906923 6.00E-09 Id NP_906922
NP_907510 3.00E-05 Id NP_907511
a

Obtained from a BLAST search with the CetA HAMP and proximal signaling domains (amino acids 44 to 139).

b

See Fig. 2.

c

The neighboring ORF encodes a PAS domain, but no other domains unless so indicated. Where two accession numbers are given, the gene encoding the HAMP-containing protein is flanked by two genes encoding PAS domain proteins.

d

Transmembrane helix prediction programs predict one transmembrane helix, but we propose that there are two transmembrane helices present in a helical hairpin (see Materials and Methods).

e

Misannotated as a DNA binding response regulator.

f

The neighboring ORF contains additional predicted functional domains.

g

Misannotated as a sensory rhodopsin II transducer.

h

Misannotated as an MCP but does not contain the highly conserved domain.

i

These HAMP/PAS pairs are adjacent to one another.

j

Misannotated as a response regulator.