Table 3.
Studya | ST use | Smoking | Sex | RR/OR | ||||
Typeb | Exposurec | No. | Casesd | Estimate (95% CI) | Notes | |||
Cohort studies | RR | |||||||
US Veterans [19] | ST | Use | Never | M | 1 | NA | 1.65 | e, f |
Lutheran Brotherhood [9] | ST | Ever | Any | M | 2 | 16 | 1.70(0.90–3.10) | |
Norway Cohorts [10] | Snuff | Ever | Any | M | 3 | 45 | 1.67(1.12–2.50) | g |
Former | Any | 4 | 18 | 1.80(1.04–3.09) | ||||
Current | Any | 5 | 27 | 1.60(1.00–2.55) | ||||
Ever | Never | 6 | 3 | 0.85(0.24–3.07) | ||||
Ever | Former | 7 | 14 | 1.37(0.59–3.17) | ||||
Ever | Current | 8 | 28 | 1.86(1.13–3.05) | ||||
Swedish Construction Workers [11] | Snuff | Ever | Any | M | 9 | NA | 0.90(0.70–1.20) | |
Ever | Never | 10 | 20 | 2.00(1.20–3.30) | ||||
Former | Never | 11 | 2 | 1.40(0.40–5.90) | ||||
Current | Never | 12 | 18 | 2.10(1.20–3.60) | ||||
Case-control studies | OR | |||||||
Third National Cancer Survey [16] | ST | Ever | Any | M | 13 | 3 | 0.29(0.09–0.92) | h |
Louisiana [20] | Chewing | Use | Any | M+F | 14 | NA | "No excess risk" | |
Snuff | Use | Any | 15 | NA | "No excess risk" | |||
Washington State [12] | Chewing | Ever | Any | M | 16 | NA | 0.80 (Not sig.) | i |
Quebec [21] | Chewing | Use | Any | M+F | 17 | NA | "Not associated with increased risk" | |
Nine Hospital [13] | Chewing | Ever | Neverj | M | 18 | 6 | 2.82(0.95–9.39) | k |
Snuff | Ever | Any | 19 | 2 | 1.32(0.22–7.93) | h | ||
Fifteen County [14] | ST | Ever | Never | M+F | 20 | 5 | 1.10(0.40–3.10) | l |
Texas [15] | Chewing | Ever | Any | M+F | 21 | 34 | 0.70(0.40–1.10) | |
Ever | Ever | 22 | 24 | 0.70(0.40–1.20) | ||||
Ever | Never | 23 | 10 | 0.60(0.30–1.40) | ||||
Snuff | Ever | Any | 24 | 18 | 0.60(0.30–1.10) | |||
Ever | Ever | 25 | 14 | 0.70(0.30–1.40) | ||||
Ever | Never | 26 | 4 | 0.50(0.10–1.50) |
a Fuller details of the studies are given in Tables 1 and 2
b ST implies smokeless tobacco unspecified or combined snuff use or chewing
c Ever, former and current ST are compared with never ST. Use indicates timing not given and comparison is with non use
d Cases in ST users as defined, NA = not available
e The abstract suggests the results are for never smokers, but this is not totally clear. The population included < 0.5% females. In earlier reports from this study [30] RRs were reported of 3.3 (statistically significant) for former ST users, and of 2.1 (not significant) for current ST users, based on, respectively, 7 and 5 cases in the exposed group
f Confidence intervals could not be calculated
g In earlier reports the risk of histologically-reported pancreatic cancer in regular ST users was stated to be 2.2 ("significant") [30] and 2.9 (trend p = 0.06) [31]
h Estimated from data provided
i Additional adjustment for age and dietary factors did not materially affect the odds ratios
j Includes long term (> 10) years quitters
k Personal communication from the author
l The authors also reported an adjusted OR of 1.4 (0.5–3.6) for the comparison (among never cigarette smokers) of ever used ST, but may have used pipe or cigar versus never used ST, pipe or cigar