Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 3;7:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-23

Table 4.

Disparities in Healthcare Access and Utilization

Commercial Low-Premium Uninsured p-value
Difficulty in access n = 98 n = 134 n = 198 <0.001
 No 51.0%(50) 43.3%(58) 24.2%(48)
 Neutral 40.8%(40) 41.8%(56) 58.6%(116)
 Yes 8.2%(8) 14.9%(20) 17.2%(34)

Care Affordability n = 102 n = 135 n = 202 0.077
 Affordable 61.8%(63) 57.8%(78) 52.0%(105)
 Neutral 24.5%(25) 18.5%(25) 29.7%(60)
 Unaffordable 13.7%(14) 23.7%(32) 18.3%(37)

Delay in seeking care1 n = 78 n = 106 n = 161 0.1052
 Yes 17.9%(14) 13.2%(14) 23.6%(38)

Foregone care n = 96 n = 133 n = 192 0.009
 Yes 11.5%(11) 14.3%(19) 24.5%(47)

Outpatient Visits n = 101 n = 140 n = 205 0.796
 None 18.8%19) 24.3%(34) 19.5%(40)
 1–2 59.4%(60) 59.3%(83) 57.6%(118)
 3–5 16.8%(17) 12.1%(17) 17.1%(35)
 >5 5.0%(5) 4.3%(5) 5.9%(12)

Satisfaction with healthcare n = 99 n = 139 n = 198 0.0673
 Satisfied 21.2%(21) 25.2%(35) 12.2%(24)
 Somewhat satisfied 40.4%(40) 41.0%(57) 43.4%(86)
 Neutral 17.2%(17) 15.8%(22) 23.7%(47)
 Unsatisfied 21.2%(21) 18.0%(25) 20.7%(41)

1. Only those reported illness were included

2. Difference between the low-premium and uninsured was more pronounced with χ2 = 3.77, df = 1, p-value = 0.05

3. Comparison of insured (commercial and coop combined) and uninsured resulted in χ2 = 10.915, df = 3, p-value = 0.012