Skip to main content
. 2007;45(8-4):1889–1898. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.12.005

Table 3.

(a) Average absolute number of distractor touches per run on medium (similar) and small (dissimilar) distractors, respectively and (b) proportion of targets of that type touched when search displays contained both types of distractor: heterogeneous displays with infrequent similar distractors or heterogeneous with infrequent dissimilar distractors

Type of distractors Distractor condition Homog. dissimilar Homog. similar Heterog. (infrequent similar) Heterog. (infrequent dissimilar)
Similar distractors
 Similar distractors per display 0 24 6 18
  Touches on similar distractors (per run) FXS 4.62 (.98) 2.15 (.45) 2.39 (.68)
MA 2.15 (.77) .77 (.32) 1.08 (.63)
  Touches on similar distractors (per run, %) FXS 19.23 (4.1) 35.89 (7.5) 13.25 (3.8)
MA 12.82 (5.4) 5.98 (3.5) 8.98 (3.2)



Dissimilar distractors
 Dissimilar distractors per display 24 0 18 6
  Touches on dissimilar distractors (per run) FXS 1.23 (.31) .30 (.13) 1.62 (.76)
MA .46 (.24) .08 (.08) .15 (.10)
  Touches on dissimilar distractors (per run, %) FXS 5.13 (2.1) 1.71 (.74) 26.92 (12.7)
MA 1.92 (1.0) .43 (.43) 2.56 (1.7)

The mean number of distractor touches for the homogeneous conditions are also provided for reference (standard error of the mean is indicated in brackets).