Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;149(1):534–548. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131367

Table II.

Parthenocarpic fruit development in Aucsia-silenced plants

Number and percentage of fruits set per number of emasculated flowers and average weight of fruits obtained from selfed and emasculated flowers belonging to six independent T0 Aucsia-silenced lines obtained in two different genetic backgrounds (L276 and INB777). The weight values reported are means ± sd (wild type, n = 18–20 selfed fruits sampled from four plants; Aucsia silenced, n = 7–13 selfed fruits sampled from one to two plants). Statistically significant differences between fruit weights of Aucsia-silenced and wild-type plants were calculated using Student's t test. Significant differences are as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.

Line Fruit Set
Average Weight
No. of Fruit/No. of Emasculated Flowers % Emasculated Selfed
g
L276 1-1 4/9 44 13.49 ± 0.85*** 38.98 ± 2.70***
L276 4-1a 7/7 100 35.47 ± 12.03** 38.43 ± 21.10*
L276 7-1 6/11 54 28.77 ± 4.25*** 34.29 ± 2.04***
L276 8-2 10/15 67 40.14 ± 2.93*** 48.38 ± 3.13*
L276 wild type 0/15 0 81.29 ± 4.39
INB777 7-1 20/25 80 18.27 ± 1.61*** 48.72 ± 5.76**
INB777 13-3 14/20 70 18.47 ± 1.36*** 61.04 ± 5.55*
INB777 wild type 0/20 0 77.40 ± 4.24
a

Obligate parthenocarpic line.