Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr;10(2):208–215. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2007-059

Table 5.

Multivariate analysis of significant prognostic factors

Variable Contrast Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-Value
Cerebral symptoms Yes vs. no 0.4 (0.2,0.8) 0.011
LS imaging Positive vs. negative 2.4 (1.1,5.5) 0.031
Cytology Positive vs. negative 3.5 (1.3,9.8) 0.017
CSF glucose >65 vs. ≤65 mg/dl 3.1 (1.3,7.7) 0.012

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LS, lumbosacral; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.

Because of a large number of comparisons (18) compared to the number of events (43), we could not fit all the covariates into a single stable model. Because several of the covariates had some missing values, we performed manual backward stepping starting with all the covariates in the model and omitting all covariates with p > 0.5.