Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):605–612. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818709fa

Table 2.

Summary of Mixed Model1 Results Allowing for Anatomic Level by Experimental Condition Interaction

Condition => Anesthesia No Advancement vs. Awake Anesthesia 50% Advancement vs. Awake Anesthesia Max Advancement vs. Awake Location by Treatment Interaction2

Variable Location/Level Est. Diff. LS Means (SE) Est. Diff. LS Means (SE) Est. Diff. LS Means (SE) p-value
Airway Area Soft Palate −51.3 41.8 −29.0 39.1 30.8 39.1 0.74
Uvula −121.3 41.8 −79.0 39.1 8.6 39.1
Tip of the Epiglottis −127.8 41.8 −83.9 39.1 9.1 39.1
Base of the Epiglottis −72.9 41.8 −41.3 39.1 7.3 39.1
AP Diameter Soft Palate −2.1 1.5 −1.6 1.4 −0.4 1.4 0.05
Uvula −6.6 1.5 −3.9 1.4 −0.8 1.4
Tip of the Epiglottis −6.1 1.5 −4.2 1.4 −2.2 1.4
Base of the Epiglottis −2.3 1.5 −2.0 1.4 −1.0 1.4
LAT Diameter Soft Palate −0.6 2.5 0.1 2.4 4.3 2.4 0.05
Uvula −6.3 2.5 −4.9 2.4 1.4 2.4
Tip of the Epiglottis −7.2 2.5 −6.1 2.4 0.2 2.4
Base of the Epiglottis −0.3 2.5 1.0 2.4 0.2 2.4
1

Notes: The mixed model analysis of variance included fixed effects for anatomic location, experimental treatment, and location by treatment interaction. Subject was included as a random effect to account for biological variability among subjects.

2

Results for interaction tests were F(9,90)=0.7, p=0.74; F(9,90)=2.0, and p=0.05; F(9,90)=2.0, p=0.05 for airway area, anteroposterior (AP) airway diameter, and lateral (LAT) airway diameter, respectively

Est. Diff LS Means = estimated difference of least square means