Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 12;4(6):667–669. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0349

Table 1.

Results from the minimal adequate model (GLM with binominal error structure; AIC=102.93, d.f.=84) for survival in relation to the treatment (n(experiment)=42; n(control)=48), age class (n(young)=35; n(older)=54) and natural badge size. (Effect size d is calculated as the difference between the experimental and control groups; a negative value of d therefore indicates that the experimental group had a smaller value than the control group.)

response predictor likelihood ratio Χ2 p effect size 95% CI
survival treatment Χ12=0.23 0.635 d=−0.100 −0.514 to 0.314
age class Χ12=3.26 0.071 r=0.190 −0.017 to 0.382
natural badge size Χ12=0.56 0.454 r=−0.080 −0.282 to 0.130
treatment×age class Χ12=6.11 0.014 d=−0.540 −0.962 to −0.118
treatment×natural badge size Χ12=8.56 0.003 d=0.648 0.223 to 1.073