Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jan;29(1):155–165. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21579

Figure 8.

Figure 8

The benefit of filtering using the FAVMF approach. a) The reduction in error/pixel achieved after filtering with FAVMF compared to no filtering; b) Comparison of peak velocities close to the wall between manual filtering, FAVMF, and No Filtering; c) Comparison of mean peak wall velocity to mean peak core velocity (MWV-MCV) ratio between manual filtering, FAVMF, and No Filtering; d) Comparison of wall shear rates evaluated using manual filtering, FAVMF, and No Filtering.