. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 6.

Published in final edited form as: Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jun;10(6):1009–1020. doi: 10.1080/14622200802097563

Table 4.

Best fitting models for predicting smoking after controlling for treatment and study

		Wald	OR	p
1-week
WISDM model: χ² = 127.19, p < .001	WISDM Tolerance	18.23	1.23	< .01
	WISDM Social/Environmental Goads	4.11	1.07	.04

NDSS model: χ² = 118.16, p < .001	NDSS Priority	11.14	1.24	< .01
	NDSS Stereotypy	8.85	1.23	< .01

NDSS/WISDM model: χ² = 127.19, p < .001	WISDM Tolerance	18.23	1.23	< .01
	WISDM Social/Environmental Goads	4.11	1.07	.04
FTND model: χ² = 141.57, p < .001	FTND	45.57	1.22	< .01
End of treatment
WISDM model: χ² = 47.48, p < .001	WISDM Tolerance	5.90	1.13	.02
	WISDM Social/Environmental Goads	7.41	1.11	< .01

NDSS model: χ² = 42.16, p < .001	NDSS Priority	11.90	1.28	< .01

NDSS/WISDM model: χ² = 49.73, p < .001	NDSS Priority	9.71	1.26	<.01
	WISDM Social/Environmental Goads	7.49	1.11	<.01

FTND model: χ² = 45.99, p < .001	FTND	14.21	1.13	< .01
6-months
WISDM model: χ² = 29.66, p < .001	WISDM Tolerance	11.04	1.21	< .01

NDSS model: χ² = 25.20, p < .001	NDSS Priority	7.78	1.28	.01

NDSS/WISDM model: χ² = 32.60, p < .001	NDSS Priority	4.96	1.23	.03
	WISDM Tolerance	7.45	1.18	.01

FTND model: χ² = 32.32, p < .001	FTND	22.93	1.14	< .01