Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 4;7:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-54

Table 2.

Comparison of parents and adolescents who participated in the field study to non- participants (data from the short questionnaire)

Variable Participants Non-participants
Prevalence n (%) Prevalence n (%) p-value
Parents of the children n = 1477 n = 628
Sex 0.29
  male 359 (24.3) 139 (22.2)
Level of education
  at least 12 years of education 748 (51.0) 250 (40.4) <0.0001
Nationality (mother) <0.0001
  German 902 (85.6) 347 (72.0)
Mobile phone ownership 0.02
1365 (92.9) 562 (89.8)
Use of a mobile phone per day 0.16
  < 5 minutes 1057 (72.4) 475 (76.4)
  > 5 minutes 404 (27.7) 147 (23.7)
Self-reported concerns about adverse health effects to EMF <0.0001
  not or little concerned 580 (55.4) 350 (72.5)
  fairly concerned 386 (36.9) 103 (22.0)
  deeply concerned 80 (7.7) 27 (5.6)
Self-estimated distance to the next base station <0.0001
  Don't know 39 (2.7) 136 (22.0)
  < 500 meters 945 (56.3) 303 (49.0)
  = 500 meters 464 (32.0) 179 (29.0)
Adolescents n = 1508 n = 814
Sex 0.009
  male 730 (48.4) 440 (54.1)
Level of education
  grammar school 743 (49.9) 253 (31.2) <0.0001
Nationality (mother) <0.0001
  German 946 (85.1) 465 (74.9)
Mobile phone ownership 0.004
1373 (91.2) 711 (87.4)
Use of a mobile phone per day 0.25
  < 5 minutes 1153 (77.1) 593 (73.6)
  > 5 minutes 343 (22.9) 213 (26.5)
Self-reported concerns about adverse health effects to EMF <0.0001
  not or little concerned 969 (87.7) 572 (92.1)
  fairly concerned 120 (10.9) 38 (6.1)
  deeply concerned 17 (1.5) 11 (1.8)
Self-estimated distance to the next base station <0.0001
  don't know 47 (3.2) 139 (17.3)
  < 500 meters 922 (62.6) 390 (48.5)
  = 500 meters 503 (34.2) 274 (34.1)

EMF: electromagnetic fields