Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 20;3(1):e361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000361

Table 2. Bivariate analysis of factors associated with Schistosoma hematobium, Blantyre schistosomiasis survey, Malawi, 2006.

Risk factor N No. infected OR (95% CI)
Age
≥14 yrs 92 6 1
≤7 yrs 63 2 0.57 (0.52–6.19)
8–10 yrs 562 46 1.75 (0.65–4.72)
11–13 yrs 414 69 3.43 (1.35–8.68)
Socio-economic status
High 249 6 1
Moderate 388 47 3.56 (1.11–11.42)
Low 502 70 4.56 (1.25–16.61)
Gender
Female 547 42 1
Male 587 80 1.89 (1.10–3.23)
Main household water source
Piped water 437 28 1
Borehole 493 64 2.13 (0.79–7.74)
Wells/River/Streams/Dams/springs 206 30 2.63 (1.07–6.46)
Location
Urban 444 19 1
Rural 695 104 4.50 (1.95–10.39)
Knowledge of open water source
No 474 17 1
Yes 657 106 4.43 (2.91–6.76)
Distance from home to open water source*
Far/ Very far 138 22 1
Close/ Very close 509 78 1.09 (0.63–1.89)
Play/bath in open water source*
No 69 10 1
Yes 580 95 1.21 (0.35–4.10)
Frequency of open water source contact*
>Monthly 74 12 1
Daily/Weekly 505 83 1.18 (0.58–2.40)
History of dysuria
No 874 77 1
Yes 250 46 1.97 (0.89–4.34)
History of schistosomiasis
No 830 50 1
Yes 303 73 4.16 (2.35–7.35)
History of schistosomiasis treatment
No 1023 104 1
Yes 112 19 1.61 (0.74–3.49)
Distance from school to nearest open water source
≥1 km 696 25 1
<1 km 443 98 5.52 (2.12–14.39)

*: Base population are the 657 pupils with knowledge of open water source.

†: Infection characterized by parasitological examination of urine.

‡: Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are weighted and account for stratification and clustering.