Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Jan;27(1):155–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05983.x

FIG. 10.

FIG. 10

Response latencies for excitation (E) to trigeminal stimulation are significantly decreased at 1 and 2 weeks following noise damage. However, excitatory/inhibitory (E/In) response latencies are significantly increased at 1 week following noise damage. An increase in latencies is seen for inhibitory units but this does not reach significance. (A) Mean latencies for all response types for all stimulus levels combined. (B) Mean latencies for E responses at individual current levels. The decrease in latency is apparent at all current levels for both 1 and 2 weeks following noise damage. (C) Mean latencies for E/In responses at individual current levels. *Significant pair-wise differences after Bonferroni correction (see text). Error bars indicate ± 1 SEM.