Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Jun 5;74(3):863–871. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.043349

Table 2.

Endogenous dNTP pools in HCT116 and SW620 cells following incubation FdUrd.

% control value

Cell Line MLH1 Status Time (h) dCTP dTTP dATP dGTP
HCT116 0–1 inactivated 4 101.5 ± 17.3 62.0 ± 9.5 136.1 ± 18.5 42.2 ± 6.6
24 95.6 ± 46.2 233.7 ± 49.9 338.5 ± 91.6 122.0 ± 48.3

HCT116 1–2 wildtype 4 85.0 ± 7.1 56.5 ± 12.6 174.4 ± 14.9 41.6 ± 0.7
24 33.4 ± 12.6 51.5 ± 0.5 71.2 ± 2.0 18.5 ± 0.4

SW620 wildtype 4 91.0 ± 1.9 10.14 ± 0.5 143.1 ± 9.6 18.2 ± 2.5
24 283.4 ± 96.3 17.06 ± 1.5 524.6 ± 92.6 41.8 ± 7.5
SW620 + non-specific shRNA Suppressed 4 91.4 ± 12.1 8.9 ± 0.5 161.3 ± 7.0 18.2 ± 4.2
24 560.2 ± 77.1 24.9 ± 7.5 790.5 ± 38.9 89.1 ± 27.7

SW620 + MLH1 targeted shRNA wildtype 4 87.1 ± 0.5 11.3 ± 0.8 152.1 ± 8.6 26.62 ± 9.2
24 410.0 ± 17.0 22.27 ± 0.07 781.9 ± 76.0 46.75 ± 22.0

Exponentially growing HCT116 MLH1-wildtype and MLH1-inactivated cells were incubated with an IC50 for FdUrd or left untreated (control). SW620 cells were left untreated or transduced with shRNA targeted to MLH1 mRNA or non-specific (NS) shRNA. Four days following shRNA treatment, exponentially growing cells were incubated with IC50 for FdUrd or left untreated (control). dNTP pools were extracted and analyzed as described in “Materials and Methods”. The data are presented as a % of the corresponding control value and represent the mean ± SD from duplicate determinations. Control values (pmol dNTP/106 cells): HCT116 0-1 cells, dCTP: 3.43 ± 1.0, dTTP: 29.7 ± 3.0, dATP: 6.1 ± 1.1, dGTP: 2.05 ± 0.6. HCT116 1-2 cells, dCTP: 4.0 ± 1.7, dTTP: 32.9 ± 2.8, dATP: 6.7 ± 0.8, dGTP: 1.97 ± 0.4. SW620, dCTP: 3.67 ± 0.5, dTTP: 20.05 ± 1.3, dATP: 3.55 ± 0.2, dGTP: 0.85 ± 0.04. SW620 +NSshRNA, dCTP: 7.06 ± 0.6, dTTP: 37.6 ± 3.1, dATP: 8.1 ± 0.2, dGTP: 1.84 ± 0.1. SW620 +MLH1shRNA, dCTP: 5.73 ± 1.3, dTTP: 21.42 ± 0.8, dATP: 4.93 ± 0.4, dGTP: 1.54 ± 0.5.