Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):572–578. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818345f0

Table 3.

Accuracy of Initial Self-Screening Compared to Provider Screening for Contraindications to Use of Oral Contraceptives

Initial self-screen1
N, % and (95% C.I.)
Provider
Contraindicated Eligible for pill
use
Total
Respondent Contraindicated 279
22.1%
(19.8-24.4%)
325
25.7%
(23.3-28.1%)
604
47.8%
(45.1-50.6%)
Eligible for pill
use
219
17.2%
(15.1-19.3%)
441
34.9%
(32.3-37.6%)
660
52.2%
(49.4-54.9%)
Total 498
39.4%
(36.7-42.2%)
766
60.6%
(57.9-63.3%)
N=1,264
100.0%
Sensitivity = 56.0%; 95% CI: (51.5-60.4%)
Specificity = 57.6%; 95% CI: (54.0-61.1%)
Positive predictive value = 46.2%, 95% CI: (42.2-50.3%)
Negative predictive value = 66.8%, 95% CI: (63.1-70.4%)
McNemar chi-square test=20.8, P=0.0
1

Initial self-screen refers to women’s answer to the question whether the pill would be bad for their health. Hormonal contraceptive users were, by default, classified as deciding that they were eligible for pill use.