Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr. 2008 Mar;138(3):574–580. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.3.574

Table 3.

Hazard Ratio of type 2 diabetes by quintiles of food groups in analyses restricted to confirmed cases of diabetes*, the Shanghai Women's Health Study

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 P trend***

All vegetables** 1.00 0.71 0.58-0.87 0.66 0.54-0.81 0.69 0.56-0.85 0.65 0.52-0.81 <0.001
Cruciferous vegetables 1.00 0.83 0.68-1.01 0.75 0.61-0.92 0.69 0.56-0.85 0.70 0.56-0.86 <0.01
Green leafy vegetables 1.00 0.86 0.70-1.04 0.69 0.56-0.85 0.67 0.54-0.82 0.78 0.64-0.96 <0.01
Yellow vegetables 1.00 0.71 0.59-0.88 0.63 0.51-0.77 0.49 0.39-0.61 0.58 0.47-0.71 <0.001
Allium vegetables 1.00 0.89 0.73-1.09 0.65 0.52-0.81 0.85 0.69-1.04 0.84 0.68-1.03 0.09
Tomatoes 1.00 0.76 0.62-0.93 0.82 0.67-1.00 0.68 0.55-0.84 0.82 0.66-1.01 0.02
Other vegetables 1.00 0.74 0.60-0.90 0.75 0.61-0.93 0.75 0.60-0.85 0.68 0.54-0.85 <0.01
All fruits 1.00 0.71 0.58-0.88 0.73 0.59-0.90 0.86 0.70-1.05 0.94 0.76-1.16 0.94
*

The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of food group or soy protein consumption on the incidence of type 2 DM. RR: Adjusted for age, , daily energy intake, meat intake, BMI, WHR, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, income level, education level, occupational status, and hypertension

**

g/day

***

Tests for trend were performed by entering the categorical variables as continuous parameters in the models.