Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;4(1):168–177. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00810208

Table 3.

Estimated risk of postnatal RPD, obstruction, or VUR according to RP size and gestational age at diagnosisa

Gestation 20 wk, 6 mm 20 wk, 7 mm 20 wk, 12 mm 25 wk, 8 mm 28 wk, 7 mm 34 wk, 14 mm
Size (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
Postnatal RPD at 6 wk 31% 47% 97% 40% 15% 88%
(14 to 54) (25 to 71) (89 to 99) (22 to 60) (5 to 35) (52 to 98)
Postnatal RPD at study end 18% 31% 95% (77 to 99) 29% 10% (3,33) 89%
(5 to 44) (11 to 62) (12 to 55) (40 to 99)
Obstruction 2% 4% 26% 4% * *
(1, 9) (1, 12) (9, 57) (1, 20)
VUR 4% 5% 15% 6% 5% 18%
(2 to 10) (2 to 12) (4 to 45) (3 to 11) (2 to 12) (4 to 55)
a

Fitted estimates of patient-based data from unselected groups were generated from the following equations:

a) Odds of persistent RPD within first 6 wk = 0.37 × (2.03)RP size × (0.82)gestation

b) Odds of persistent RPD at the end of study = 0.07 × (2.12)RP size × (0.84)gestation

c) Odds of obstruction = 0.01 × (1.56)RP size × (0.92)gestation

d) Odds of VUR = 0.01 × (1.25)RP size × (0.99)gestation

Note: These are estimated equations and estimates must be viewed with caution because of potential for uncontrolled confounding within meta-analyses.

*

There were no studies with values for obstruction after 26 wk so it was not possible to generate statistically robust estimates at the 28- and 34-wk stages.

RPD, renal pelvis dilation; VUR, vesicoureteric reflux; MCUG, micturating cysto-urethrogram; CI, confidence interval.