Skip to main content
PMC home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1984 Dec;46(3):873–875. doi: 10.1128/iai.46.3.873-875.1984

Histological and immunopathological studies of delayed hypersensitivity reaction to tuberculin in mice.

M Pelletier, A Forget, D Bourassa, E Skamene
PMCID: PMC261632  PMID: 6500718

Abstract

At 4 to 6 weeks after intravenous infection with 2 X 10(4) CFU of dispersed Mycobacterium bovis bacilli (BCG), C3H/HeNCrIBR and C57BL/6NCrIBR mice exhibited a strong reaction to purified protein derivatives, as evaluated by the increase in footpad swelling at both 24 and 48 h after local antigenic challenge. However, histological studies of the footpad skin demonstrated a prominent perivascular infiltration with polymorphonuclear cells at 6 and 24 h after purified protein derivative challenge, whereas mononuclear cells represented the majority of infiltrating cells only at 48 h. An immunopathological study of the footpad skin showed granular deposits of immunoglobulins and complement in vascular walls and perivascular tissues at 6 and 24 h. These results demonstrate that the footpad swelling observed 24 h after the antigenic challenge is caused by an Arthus-type reaction, whereas that caused by cell-mediated immunity appears at 48 h. Hence, delayed hypersensitivity must be evaluated at 48 and not 24 h after challenge.

Full text

PDF
873

Images in this article

874Image
on p.874

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anacker R. L., Ribi E., Tarmina D. F., Fadness L., Mann R. E. Relationship of footpad sensitivity to purified protein derivatives and resistance to airborne infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis of mice vaccinated with mycobacterial cell walls. J Bacteriol. 1969 Oct;100(1):51–57. doi: 10.1128/jb.100.1.51-57.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloom B. R., Chase M. W. Transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity. A critical review and experimental study in the guinea pig. Prog Allergy. 1967;10:151–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CROWLE A. J. Tuberculin skin reactions in mice hypersensitized by vaccination with living avirulent tubercle bacilli. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1960 Jun;81:893–903. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1960.81.6.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Closs O., Løvik M. Protective immunity and delayed-type hypersensitivity in C57BL mice after immunization with live Mycobacterium lepraemurium and sonicated bacilli. Infect Immun. 1980 Jul;29(1):17–23. doi: 10.1128/iai.29.1.17-23.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen S. The role of cell-mediated immunity in the induction of inflammatory responses. Parke-Davis Award Lecture, 1977. Am J Pathol. 1977 Sep;88(3):502–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowle A. J. Delayed hypersensitivity in the mouse. Adv Immunol. 1975;20:197–264. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60209-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DIETRICH F. M., NORDIN A. A., BLOCH H. Delayed hypersensitivity in tuberculous mice. II. Generalized tuberculin reaction and foot pad tests. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1962;20:129–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Forget A., Skamene E., Gros P., Miailhe A. C., Turcotte R. Differences in response among inbred mouse strains to infection with small doses of Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Infect Immun. 1981 Apr;32(1):42–47. doi: 10.1128/iai.32.1.42-47.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KOSUNEN T. U., WAKSMAN B. H., FLAX M. H., TIHEN W. S. Radioautographic study of cellular mechanisms in delayed hypersensitivity. I. Delayed reactions to tuberculin and purified proteins in the rat and guinea-pig. Immunology. 1963 May;6:276–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. MCCLUSKEY R. T., BENACERRAF B., MCCLUSKEY J. W. STUDIES ON THE SPECIFICITY OF THE CELLULAR INFILTRATE IN DELAYED HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS. J Immunol. 1963 Mar;90:466–477. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meyer T. J., Anacker R. L., Ribi E. Effects of pretreatment of mice with BCG cell walls in saline on subsequent vaccination with BCG oil droplet vaccine. Cell Immunol. 1974 Oct;14(1):52–65. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(74)90169-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakamura R. M., Tokunaga T. Strain difference of delayed-type hypersensitivity to BCG and its genetic control in mice. Infect Immun. 1978 Dec;22(3):657–664. doi: 10.1128/iai.22.3.657-664.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pelletier M., Forget A., Bourassa D., Gros P., Skamene E. Immunopathology of BCG infection in genetically resistant and susceptible mouse strains. J Immunol. 1982 Nov;129(5):2179–2185. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rook G. A. Three forms of delayed skin-test response evoked by mycobacteria. Nature. 1978 Jan 5;271(5640):64–65. doi: 10.1038/271064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Youmans G. P., Youmans A. S. Allergenicity of mycobacterial ribosomal and ribonucleic acid preparations in mice and guinea pigs. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jan;97(1):134–139. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.1.134-139.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES