Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1090

Table 1.

Characteristics of students at baseline in two active intervention arms (InfoRetriever and pocket card) and control arm. Values are numbers (percentages) of students unless stated otherwise

Characteristic Pocket card group (n=59) Control group (n=55) InfoRetriver group (n=54)
Mean (SD) age (years) 22.4 (1.1) 22.3 (0.7) 22.5 (1.3)
Women 25 (42) 25 (45) 20 (37)
Educational background:
Local secondary school 44 (75) 46 (84) 45 (83)
Local international or overseas secondary school 11 (19) 8 (15) 6 (11)
University 4 (7) 1 (2) 3 (6)
Mean (SD) examination scores by year 3 68.1 (3.7) 69.7 (4.1) 68.8 (3.6)
Mean (SD) factor scores:
Personal application and current use of evidence based medicine 2.2 (0.5) 2.4 (0.5) 2.3 (0.6)
Future use of evidence based medicine 3.9 (0.6) 3.7 (0.6) 3.8 (0.7)
Individual item scores:
Frequency of looking up evidence1* 1.2 (1.2) 1.1 (1.0) 0.7 (0.8)
Frequency of raising role of current best evidence2 2.6 (1.0) 2.9 (1.0) 2.5 (0.8)
Confidence in clinical decision making3 2.8 (0.8) 2.9 (0.7) 2.6 (0.8)
*

On average, how often do you look up evidence during or after clerking each patient on the ward or in the clinic?

How frequently have you raised the role of current best evidence during teaching rounds or bedside teaching?

How much confidence do you have in your clinical decision making?