Skip to main content
. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1090

Table 2.

Changes in mean scores from baseline to first assessment in three intervention arms. Values are mean differences (95% confidence intervals) unless stated otherwise

P values
Scores Pocket card group Control group InfoRetriever group Between groups overall Group A v B Group B v C Group A v C For linear trend
Factor scores:
Personal application and current use of evidence based medicine 0.47 (0.31 to 0.63) −0.07 (−0.25 to 0.10) 0.45 (0.29 to 0.61) <0.001 <0.001*** <0.001*** 0.84 <0.001
Future use of evidence based medicine 0.01 (−0.15 to 0.17) −0.01 (−0.17 to 0.14) 0.03 (−0.15 to 0.22) 0.47 NA NA NA NA
Individual item scores
Frequency of looking up evidence −0.26 (−0.59 to 0.08) −0.25 (−0.52 to 0.03) 0.56 (0.25 to 0.86) 0.012 0.70 0.0039* 0.032 <0.001
Frequency of raising role of current best evidence 0.32 (0.04 to 0.60) 0.15 (−0.16 to 0.45) 0.87 (0.56 to 1.18) 0.024 0.87 0.036 0.015* 0.001
Confidence in clinical decision making 0.09 (−0.13 to 0.30) 0.04 (−0.21 to 0.28) 0.30 (0.06 to 0.55) 0.60 NA NA NA NA

Levels of significance after Bonferroni correction: *<0.017; **<0.003; ***<0.0003.

NA=not available (>0.05 in between group comparison overall).

Control group versus pocket card group versus InfoRetriever group C during first rotation.

Full questions in footnote to table 1.