Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;35(1):182–196. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn158

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Illustration of the Main Events (a), Response Categories and Outcome (b) of the SAT as Used in Rats and Illustration of Performance Data From SAT and dSAT Sessions (c–h; base task performance: black lines, squares; distractor condition: orange lines, triangles; data from Wistar rats; the presence of the distractor in blocks 2 and 3 is indicated by the oranges block on the abscissa). The performance in signal and nonsignal trials is collapsed into one measure of performance, the SAT/dSAT scores (h). SAT/dSAT scores are calculated for each signal duration (eg, 500, 50, 25 ms; SAT/dSAT500,50,25) on the basis of the relative number of hits (h) and false alarms (f), in accordance with this formula: (SAT/dSAT = [(h − f)/2(h + f) − (h + f)2]) and then averaged over all signal durations, yielding a single overall score (h). The formula is a variation of the nonparametric calculation of signal sensitivity. Signal intensity is based on the probabilities for hits and false alarms. In contrast, the calculation of SAT/dSAT scores is based on the relative number of hits and false alarms, thereby removing the confounding effects of omissions from this performance measure. SAT/dSAT scores range from −1 to +1. Values of 0 indicate randomized lever section, +1 indicates perfect response accuracy in signal and nonsignal trials, and −1 indicates complete inaccuracy. The scores shown in (h) are averaged over all signal durations and depicted by block to visualize the contrast between SAT and dSAT scores.