Skip to main content
. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14742–14746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14742

Table 3.

Analysis of variance in BcL1 population

Titration time Markers Multifactorial model
Monofactorial model
No interaction
2-by-2 factor interactions
R.E.*, % F P values R.E.*, % F P values R.E.*, % F P values
Day 5 D4Mit31 7.7 8.2 5.1 × 10−3 8.3 13.5 4.0 × 10−4 9.7 16.1 1.0 × 10−4
D6Mit5 7.9 8.4 4.6 × 10−3 4.7 7.6 6.9 × 10−3 3.8 6.3 1.4 × 10−2
D8Mit35 6.5 6.8 1.0 × 10−2 4.0 6.5 1.2 × 10−2 3.8 6.3 1.4 × 10−2
D10Mit14 6.4 6.8 1.1 × 10−2 3.2 5.3 2.4 × 10−2 3.0 4.9 2.9 × 10−2
D12Nds2 11.7 13.0 5.0 × 10−4 13.2 21.4 <1.0 × 10−4 15.0 24.9 <1.0 × 10−4
D18Mit12 6.0 6.3 1.3 × 10−2 8.6 14.0 3.0 × 10−4 10.6 17.7 1.0 × 10−4
Day 14 D4Mit31 9.7 10.5 1.6 × 10−3 10.4 16.7 1.0 × 10−4 9.2 14.7 2.0 × 10−4
D6Mit5 6.1 6.4 1.3 × 10−2 3.2 5.1 2.6 × 10−2 4.0 6.4 1.3 × 10−2
D8Mit35 10.7 11.8 9.0 × 10−4 8.2 13.2 4.0 × 10−4 9.4 14.9 2.0 × 10−4
D10Mit14 3.6 3.7 5.8 × 10−2 1.9 3.1 8.3 × 10−2 0.8 1.2 3.0 × 10−1
D12Mit33 5.5 5.8 1.8 × 10−2 9.4 15.1 2.0 × 10−4 9.0 14.3 3.0 × 10−4
D18Mit12 8.3 9.0 3.4 × 10−3 12.6 20.3 <1.0 × 10−4 12.1 19.3 <1.0 × 10−4

*Relative effect: R.E., % = (mean square/total square sum) × 100.