TABLE 5.
UTI-prone subject no. | Nugent score | Lactobacillus-specific probe result (no. of positive samples)
|
Eubacterium-specific probe result
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. iners | L. mucosae | L. crispatus | Lactobacillus sp. | Staphylococcus | Clostridium | Fusobacterium | Streptococcus | ||
1 | 1 | + | + | + | |||||
3 | 1 | + (2) | |||||||
18 | 1 | + | |||||||
29 | 1 | + | |||||||
2 | 2 | + (2) | + | ||||||
24 | 3 | + | |||||||
27 | 3 | + | |||||||
33 | 3 | + | |||||||
26 | 4 | + | |||||||
6 | 5 | + | |||||||
32 | 5 | Weak | |||||||
34 | 6 | Weak | |||||||
11 | 7 | ||||||||
20 | 7 | + | + | + | |||||
30 | 7 | + | |||||||
28 | 8 | + | |||||||
5 | 9 | + | + | ||||||
39 | 9 | + |
Vaginal swabs from four UTI-prone subjects were quantitatively inadequate for microbiological analyses.