Table 4.
Numbers needed to treat (NNT)
| N patients | treatment | estimated loco-reg RR (examples) | n R | n treated R | cure rate R (n) | survival (n) | NNT |
| 100 | OP only | 10% | 10 | 10 | 50% (5) | 95% (95) | 21 |
| 100 | postop RT | 5% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50% (0.25) | 99.75% (99.75) | |
| 100 – 10 M+ | OP only | 10% | 10 | 10 | 50% (5) | 85% (85) | 21 |
| 100 – 10 M+ | postop RT | 5% | 0.5 | 0.5 | 50% (0.25) | 89.75% (89.75) | |
| 100 | OP only | 30% | 30 | 30 | 50% (15) | 85% (85) | 8 |
| 100 | postop RT | 15% | 5 | 5 | 50% (2.5) | 97.5% (97.5) | |
| 100 – 20 M+ | OP only | 30% | 30 | 30 | 50% (15) | 65% (65) | 8 |
| 100 – 20 M+ | postop RT | 15% | 5 | 5 | 50% (2.5) | 77.5% (77.5) |
Estimated numbers needed to treat (NNT), calculated for two populations with an estimated risk for recurrence (RR) of 10% (white) or 30% (grey), respectively (RR of 5% in postoperative IMRT cohorts has been derived from the own postoperative IMRT pT1-2 -fraction [16]). The calculations were performed each with and without considering the distant metastasis (M+) fraction; the percentage of M+ was based on the observed M+ rate in the own IMRT population; with higher local-regional risk (e.g. 30%), the M+ rate is usually also expected increasing (e.g. ~20%). This data suggest the generous indication for postoperative IMRT in initial situations with estimated RR exceeding ~10–15%.
n treated R: number of treated recurrences (idealised value, as not all rHNC patients can undergo salvage treatment with curative intention [6,8,29]).