Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Dec 6;18(1):235–243. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006040394

Table 3.

Adjusted HR for incident microalbuminuria associated with each 10-cm greater waist circumference, by covariate subgroup

Group No. of Events/No. at Risk Adjusted HR (95% CI)a Pb
All patients 93/1105 1.34 (1.07 to 1.68)
Age (yr)
 <30 23/276 1.31 (0.84 to 2.04) 0.890
 30 to 40 36/514 1.30 (0.93 to 1.81)
 >40 34/222 1.44 (1.03 to 1.99)
Gender
 female 30/486 1.65 (1.12 to 2.42) 0.209
 male 63/526 1.23 (0.94 to 1.62)
Race
 white 88/983 1.35 (1.08 to 1.70) 0.867
 nonwhite 5/29 0.82 (0.20 to 3.45)
DCCT treatment group
 intensive 26/554 1.40 (1.03 to 1.89) 0.697
 conventional 67/458 1.29 (0.95 to 1.75)
HbA1c (%)
 <7 4/240 1.71 (0.81 to 3.63) 0.470
 7 to 9 24/527 1.45 (1.06 to 1.99)
 >9 65/245 1.18 (0.88 to 1.58)
AER (mg/24 h)
 <10 31/598 1.23 (0.83 to 1.80) 0.805
 10 to 20 35/342 1.29 (0.93 to 1.77)
 20 to 30 27/72 1.45 (0.99 to 2.10)
a

Discrete proportional hazards model includes waist circumference (scaled to 10 cm), age, gender, race, duration of diabetes, DCCT treatment group, smoking status, HbA1c, and AER, each measured at DCCT closeout.

b

Tests hypothesis that HR differs among subgroups of covariate.