Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr 21;6:183–201. doi: 10.4137/cin.s556

Figure 3. Hierarchical clustering of ETV6-modulated genes by GO terms and associations with expression groups.

Figure 3

A hierarchical tree of ETV6-modulated genes was constructed using all the GO terms associated to the genes analysed. Coloured squares below gene symbols identify the expression group of the corresponding gene as determined by hierarchical clustering in Figure 2: 1) Pearson correlation distances at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h and 48 h (HP 0 h–48 h) (Fig. 2A); 2) Euclidean distances at 0 h, 4 h, 12 h and 48 h (HE 0 h–48 h) (Fig. 2B) and; 3) Euclidean distances at 0 h and 4 h (HE 0 h–4 h) (Fig. 2C). Expression groups are shown in several rows to represent all the possible group sub-divisions: the bottom row of squares shows the colours that assign each gene to its smallest expression group (colours just below the gene symbols in Fig. 2) and the rows above show the colours assigned to each gene after some close expression groups have been merged (e.g. grey, blue, red and green in Figure 2A are merged in a larger orange branch). Values at the bottom are Fisher’s exact p-values assigned to the node marked by the arrow on the branch above and the expression clustering methods are indicated on the left (numbers). The colour assigned to the p-value is indicative of the group that is over-represented in the branch. The yellow rectangles around the coloured squares delineate the genes that belong to a node where a significant over-representation is observed. FDR correction for multiple testing: *: significant when FDR = 5%; +: significant when FDR = 10%; &: significant when FDR = 15%.