Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 20;9(4):354–363. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.4.354

Table 3.

Failure Rates in 2005 and 2006 for Each Type of Phantom Image Evaluation

graphic file with name kjr-9-354-i003.jpg

Note.-No = Number of each type of phantom image evaluation, No. of failures = Number of failed cases for each type of phantom image evaluation Proportion # = Number of each type/total number×100, Failure rate = Number of failed cases for each type/total number×100