Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Genet. 2008 Nov 6;124(6):593–605. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0582-9

Table 2.

Additive model: SNPs providing the strongest association results (p < 0.0001)

# Gene regiona Chr SNP Minor allele Positionb MAF case MAF control Odds ratioc p value Meta-analysis p valued
1 GAK/DGKQ 4 rs1564282 T 842313 0.131 0.087 1.70 6.0 × 10−6 6.7 × 10−7
rs11248051 T 848332 0.132 0.087 1.70 5.2 × 10−6 .
rs11248060 T 954359 0.145 0.097 1.69 3.4 × 10−6 2.5 × 10−7
2 COX6CP2/PTPN1 20 rs4811072 G 48519524 0.291 0.238 1.40 6.5 × 10−5 4.7 × 10−4
rs1997791 G 48529835 0.297 0.238 1.43 1.9 × 10−5 5.9 × 10−5
3 LOC729075 4 rs2654735 C 112618062 0.391 0.461 0.75 9.0 × 10−5 1.3 × 10−3
rs1806506 A 112686700 0.386 0.459 0.74 3.7 × 10−5 6.3 × 10−4
rs11729080 A 112723321 0.135 0.187 0.66 3.3 × 10−5 1.8 × 10−2
4 LOC727725/ZMAT4 8 rs4736788 T 40947586 0.223 0.276 0.70 4.9 × 10−5 9.9 × 10−4
rs10094981 C 40950451 0.223 0.276 0.70 4.8 × 10−5 9.7 × 10−4
5 HRNBP3 17 rs898528 T 74678398 0.296 0.368 0.74 4.9 × 10−5 1.7 × 10−4
6 LAMP1 13 rs12871648 C 113018663 0.376 0.316 1.36 5.0 × 10−5 9.4 × 10−4
7 LTBP1 2 rs4670322 G 33309246 0.323 0.256 1.38 5.1 × 10−5 2.0 × 10−3
8 Gene desert 10 rs11592212 C 110407383 0.085 0.052 1.80 5.2 × 10−5 6.5 × 10−3
9 SNCA/GPRIN3/MMRN1 4 rs4106153 C 90463499 0.167 0.219 0.70 9.2 × 10−5 1.1 × 10−3
rs1504489 T 90477611 0.362 0.424 0.75 8.4 × 10−5 5.1 × 10−3
rs356229 G 90825620 0.435 0.369 1.35 5.5 × 10−5 3.5 × 10−4
rs356188 G 90910560 0.177 0.225 0.70 8.4 × 10−5 3.5 × 10−4
rs3775478 G 91061863 0.102 0.069 1.69 6.1 × 10−5 1.6 × 10−4
10 PRDM13/MCHR2 6 rs4431442 G 100320236 0.322 0.262 1.39 5.6 × 10−5 3.2 × 10−3
11 VPS8 3 rs10937194 G 186201412 0.192 0.241 0.70 5.9 × 10−5 6.5 × 10−4
12 CGRRF1/SAMD4A 14 rs4901519 C 54088930 0.115 0.152 0.65 7.6 × 10−5 1.3 × 10−4
13 C17orf69/PLEKHM1/MAPT 17 rs11012 A 40869224 0.143 0.196 0.68 8.8 × 10−5 4.8 × 10−5
rs1724425 T 41137530 0.387 0.449 0.75 7.8 × 10−5 8.2 × 10−5
14 LEKR1 3 rs12638253 C 158108785 0.447 0.524 0.75 8.3 × 10−5 5.0 × 10−4
15 POU6F2 7 rs9655034 T 39258636 0.483 0.414 1.33 8.8 × 10−5 5.1 × 10−4
16 TMEM108 3 rs1197313 T 134583142 0.393 0.451 0.75 8.9 × 10−5 3.8 × 10−4
17 LOC728328/PCTK2 12 rs7312607 C 95350301 0.487 0.434 1.33 9.3 × 10−5 .
18 FGF12 3 rs9859577 T 193571219 0.125 0.172 0.67 9.9 × 10−5 .
19 LOC652429/TMEM132B 12 rs2108521 C 124901417 0.219 0.271 0.72 1.0 × 10−4 4.4 × 10−4

Bold indicates entries where results from the meta-analysis had smaller p values than the initial results from this study, a period (.) indicates that the marker was not genotyped in the Fung et al. study, a “gene desert” is defined here as being more than 500 kb from any gene listed in RefSeq

a

Genes taken from the NCBI mRNA reference sequences collection (RefSeq)

b

From NCBI Build 36 reference

c

Odds ratios were computed for the minor allele

d

Meta-analysis with Fung et al.