Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Oct 31;63(2):133–139. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.075721

Table 1.

Brief description of life course SES groups defined using latent class analysis in analysis sample (N=12,940) from Wave I (1994-1995) and Wave III (2000-2001) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

Life course SES % (n) Description
Persistent disadvantage
Age (yrs): 22.1
Female (%): 45.6
17.7 (2,223) Parental SES
  • Low income, low education, single mother

  • No health insurance, receiving public assistance


Young adult SES
  • Low income, low education, attend vocational school

  • Low health insurance, limited financial access

Disadvantage with autonomy
Age (yrs): 22.1
Female (%): 44.9
15.0 (2,057) Parental SES
  • Low income, less than HS education, two parents

  • Manual occupation, low health insurance


Young adult SES
  • Middle/high income, low education

  • Low insurance, married, own home

Material advantage
Age (yrs): 21.7
Female (%): 44.1
28.5 (3,438) Parental SES
  • Middle income, HS educated, two parents

  • Minimal hardship, average social capital


Young adult SES
  • High income, average education, minimal hardship

  • Attend vocational school or college

Educational advantage
Age (yrs): 21.9
Female (%): 53.2
13.8 (1,989) Parental SES
  • Middle income, middle/high education, single mother

  • Minimal hardship, high social capital


Young adult SES
  • Middle income, middle/high education

  • Sales or service occupations, high social capital

Highest overall advantage
Age (yrs): 21.7
Female (%): 59.9
25.0 (3,223) Parental SES
  • High income, advanced education, two parents

  • Prof. occupation, high insurance, low assistance


Young adult SES
  • Middle income, high education, managerial/prof. occ.

  • High health insurance, high financial access